: One computer is designated as the passive listener. It waits on a specific network port (default is 8988) to receive incoming traffic.
: Unlike command-line tools like IPerf, LANBench provides a graphical interface, making it a "quick test" favorite for sysadmins. Benchmark Performance Analysis
name: "Simple Q&A" prompts: ["What is the capital of France?", "Explain quantum computing in one sentence."] concurrency_levels: [1, 5, 10] max_tokens: 256 temperature: 0.0
If your LANBench results are lower than expected, check for these common network culprits:
Set how long the benchmark should run (e.g., 10 to 30 seconds is standard). LANBench
The process typically involves:
A second computer acts as the sender, flooding the connection with data packets directed at the server.
Supports testing simultaneous data streams to simulate a multi-user environment.
What do the numbers mean? Use this quick benchmark reference for standard wired networks: Network Type Expected Theoretical Speed Healthy LANBench Result 90 – 95 Mbps Gigabit Ethernet (1G) 1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) 900 – 940 Mbps Multi-Gigabit (2.5G) 2500 Mbps (2.5 Gbps) 2.2 – 2.3 Gbps : One computer is designated as the passive listener
While LANBench is excellent, it's not the only tool on the block. Here's how it stacks up against its main rivals:
LANBench is an essential tool for several network management tasks:
A lightweight orchestration script (usually Go or Rust for concurrency) that manages test cases. It loads a prompt dataset (e.g., dialogues.json or code_gen.json ), defines concurrency levels, and sends requests.
: Was it the switch? The enthusiast bypassed it and connected the PCs directly. LANBench roared to life, hitting 900+ Mbps [5]. The switch was the culprit. What do the numbers mean
Configure multiple concurrent connections to stress-test network interfaces and routers.
If testing wired speeds, ensure both devices use at least Cat5e or Cat6 ethernet cables.
LANBench follows a classic :